|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 16 post(s) |
Harvey James
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
402
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 22:21:00 -
[1] - Quote
ZeeWolf Novus wrote:Any and all asymmetrical ships.
This.. i hate wonky and odd stuff ..
Crow .. i hate one side being different to the other.. Atron Thorax especially it looks like its dragging a moldy turd along with it. Mega/Mach model has a random engine on top please remove it Cerberus make it red and black and make it more like a klingon bird of prey please Arazu looks like some sort of butt plug Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name AB's need a buff-á like a big mass reduction ... module tiercide FTW role based instead of tiers please. |
Harvey James
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
403
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 12:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
and switch the Command ships around and do the same with Assault frigs. Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name AB's need a buff-á like a big mass reduction ... module tiercide FTW role based instead of tiers please. |
Harvey James
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
403
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 13:29:00 -
[3] - Quote
On the caldari it is odd that so many ships look like blobs of squares... blackbird, moa osprey..
As considering the names of caldari ships are bird based then surely wing based ships make the most sense perhaps to resemble the name of the ship ... so blackbird could look like an actual blackbird in flight.. i like the caracal line a symmetrical bird like design Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name AB's need a buff-á like a big mass reduction ... module tiercide FTW role based instead of tiers please. |
Harvey James
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
414
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 13:05:00 -
[4] - Quote
Baby ChuChu wrote:Not really a fan of any of the Caldari cruisers, especially the Caracal. You could literally turn it into a giant cube for all I care. Just get rid of that current eyesore.
what!!! the caracal looks cool now im sure it got remodelled a little ... like a Klingon bird of prey i think of them, im hoping for the Cerberus to get the red and black look Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name AB's need a buff-á like a big mass reduction ... module tiercide FTW role based instead of tiers please. |
Harvey James
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
414
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 17:53:00 -
[5] - Quote
I would love the enyo to lose its stupid pointy bit .. why is it there??? its looks stupid Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name AB's need a buff-á like a big mass reduction ... module tiercide FTW role based instead of tiers please. |
Harvey James
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
417
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 10:53:00 -
[6] - Quote
Rumtin wrote:This should have been a poll, not a thread.
As for ship redesign, please CCP, stay in tune with the spirit of the ships design. Keep the caldari that ridged boxy design, the scrap metal rust of minmitar, the metallic sleek gold of amarr and the oval organic feel of galentea. Just make the ships more visually appealing while staying in touch with their respective traits (i. e. Scorpion). Also please fix the pirate faction ships that don't have a unique hull.
~Rumtin
Caldari aren't supposed to be boxy at all they are supposed to be bird like with wings .. Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name AB's need a buff-á like a big mass reduction ... module tiercide FTW role based instead of tiers please. |
Harvey James
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
417
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 11:28:00 -
[7] - Quote
Rumtin wrote:Just because their named after birds does not mean they take on bird traits. If that was the case then why would they name a ship after an insect?
shrugs.... but loads of caldari ships have wings so... Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name AB's need a buff-á like a big mass reduction ... module tiercide FTW role based instead of tiers please. |
Harvey James
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
417
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 12:22:00 -
[8] - Quote
CCP BunnyVirus wrote:Cassius Invictus wrote:Harvey James wrote:ZeeWolf Novus wrote:Any and all asymmetrical ships. Mega/Mach model has a random engine on top please remove it The odd engine thingi on Mach and Mega looks just stupid and annoying. For gods sake this engine is not even working! Also pls remove the side sponson on the front of the Omen. DonGÇÖt damage my beloved Amarr ships with asymmetric design! Leave that for Minmatar junk ;). Also Absolution/Prophecy - the model is very cool, but outdated . It is too fat and too short. Make it longer and remove the fat belly, it looks like itGÇÖs pregnantGǪ BTW if u change my dear Absolution to Harbinger model I will hack EVE, fly a dread fleet to high sec and destroy every station with your clone on it. Then again a Hurricane model on on Sleipnir would be sexy. Ps. DonGÇÖt care for Caldari much but their entire frigate, cruiser an probably bc line needs a serious work (with nuclear blasts). That Engine thing on the mega is not an engine
whatever it is it needs to be deleted Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name AB's need a buff-á like a big mass reduction ... module tiercide FTW role based instead of tiers please. |
Harvey James
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
417
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 12:57:00 -
[9] - Quote
Rumtin wrote:Harvey James wrote:
shrugs.... but loads of caldari ships have wings so...
Doesn't mean there not ridged and boxy. Look at their design, each one has sharp (almost) 90-¦ angels. The body on most is very squarish, Kestel, Moa, Caracal, Drake, Raven, Bantan, Rokh, Blackbird, Ferox... each of these hulls have very ridged and boxy like designs to them. Its the Caldari look. Wings or no wings, this is the way they were designed.
i get what you mean now... but caldari are supposed to be efficient so boxy designs don't seem very efficient to me it would make sense if they smoothed those boxy edges down a bit and focus on improving the wings and symmetry of the ships Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name AB's need a buff-á like a big mass reduction ... module tiercide FTW role based instead of tiers please. |
Harvey James
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
419
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 15:20:00 -
[10] - Quote
CCP BunnyVirus wrote:Harvey James wrote:ZeeWolf Novus wrote:Any and all asymmetrical ships. Mega/Mach model has a random engine on top please remove it Quote:The odd engine thingi on Mach and Mega looks just stupid and annoying. For gods sake this engine is not even working! Also pls remove the side sponson on the front of the Omen. DonGÇÖt damage my beloved Amarr ships with asymmetric design! Leave that for Minmatar junk ;).
Also Absolution/Prophecy - the model is very cool, but outdated . It is too fat and too short. Make it longer and remove the fat belly, it looks like itGÇÖs pregnantGǪ
BTW if u change my dear Absolution to Harbinger model I will hack EVE, fly a dread fleet to high sec and destroy every station with your clone on it. Then again a Hurricane model on on Sleipnir would be sexy.
Ps. DonGÇÖt care for Caldari much but their entire frigate, cruiser an probably bc line needs a serious work (with nuclear blasts). That Engine thing on the mega is not an engine whatever it is it needs to be deleted nope
are you telling me that it actually adds something to those models???? Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name AB's need a buff-á like a big mass reduction ... module tiercide FTW role based instead of tiers please. |
|
Harvey James
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
419
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 15:32:00 -
[11] - Quote
Isaak Artorius wrote:Phoenix Jones wrote:The most dramatic ships that need a total remodel.. The Dominix.... the Dominix by FAAAAAAAAAAR. The Dominix is the old workhorse of the Gallente Navy. More to that is that this workhorse has been redone quite a bit, and while being a mainstay of the Gallente Navy, is massively out of date regarding spec's. If I were a gambling man, I would leave the Navy Dominix as the current Dominix hull (the Spacewhale, potato shoe turd), and re-purpose the base Dominix to This: http://www.deviantart.com/art/Naru-Kami-Final-179403464That ship took 2nd place. Just tint it green. I would love the Vexor to be redone, maybe look something like this. http://baranha.deviantart.com/art/FUJIN-FINAL-181896594Now looking at its design from the Vexor, the changes are not overly substantial. Again I would leave the Navy Vexor as the original Vexor hull (The Gallente Navy don't like spending isk on new design ships when they can just buy the old ones rotting away for cheap and repurpose them), and change the Vexor and the Ishtar to the above (gives the newer people interesting new ship designs while keeping the old workhorse as the new navy variant). Yes I know these are iconic, but Iconic does not mean "Stuck as is forever," they aren't historical monuments. The original flavor of the ships will be kept in the navy version of the hulls (which is important as the navy would keep an older model as it would cost the Navy Department Much Less to buy the old Dominix's and repurpose them, than buy the new updated model just to make them as useful as the old models, but cost a bunch more for designer "fluff". You can design two new hulls for these two old favorites, re-giving them life. The other benefit, the two above art submissions were submitted through your eve arts contest, so I believe you have the right to use these ship designs ALREADY (submissions are legal tender that they give up the right of the design and maybe used in game as CCP sees fit, check your legal). That design is more along Caldari lines of ship design - Corax draws heavily on navy/submarine theme. If the devs give me a caldari gunboat looking like that I will give them my firstborn.
i would just love some proper blaster caldari gunboats instead of always being railgun based
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name AB's need a buff-á like a big mass reduction ... module tiercide FTW role based instead of tiers please. |
Harvey James
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
419
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 16:32:00 -
[12] - Quote
anyone think there are too many mega variations? 4 seems a little too many ... Change the kronos to the Hyperion model would make sense.... maybe change vindi a little to a more unique model Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name AB's need a buff-á like a big mass reduction ... module tiercide FTW role based instead of tiers please. |
Harvey James
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
419
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 16:51:00 -
[13] - Quote
Maybe navy versions could be slightly different to the normal versions beyond just skins.
-T1 basic model - Navy different skin and some alterations to match bonuses of ship -T2 different skin , larger changes to match the manufacturer and bonuses of ships - pirate versions get much larger changes than both Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name AB's need a buff-á like a big mass reduction ... module tiercide FTW role based instead of tiers please. |
|
|
|